International Journal of Emerging Technologies

  • Journals
  • /
  • International Journal of Emerging Technologies

Published in International Journal of Emerging Technologies on Tue Apr 09 2019 12:14:40 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Vol: 1, No: 2, Page: 12-11
DOI: 10.15562/ijet.17

Human and Bacterial Amylases: Computational Bioinformatics

Ghorani Azam Adel , Ghorani Azam Adel *
Correspondence*:

dr. Ghorani Azam Adel , Biology
Tehran University
abc@gmail.com

Abstract:
Amylase is an enzyme with broad hydrolysis activities that catalyzes the hydrolysis of starch into glucose and other small molecules such as maltose. It is an enzyme of glycoside family with surface layer homology (SLH) domain. SLH, which is known as cell wall binding domain is essential for binding to peptidoglycan of cell membranes. Since designing and producing enzymes with strong catalytic activity is essential in future food industry, investigating the similarities of amylases of different species can be helpful in protein engineering of these enzymes. Homology alignment of bacterial and human amylase sequences shows that both sequences contain 511 amino acid that are highly conserved with several repeated sequences that seems to be necessary for catalysis activity and structural conformation of the protein. In this study, we aimed to characterize the most critical structural and catalytic domains of amylase using bioinformatics tools. In this study, it was shown that SLH and starch binding domain (SBD) are extremely conserved in both human and bacterial amylase. In addition, it was shown that similar domain with several repeated di- or tri-peptide sequences existed in almost all amylases indicating that these residues may have valuable functional, structural and evolutional information. The results of this study may provide new insights into biological aspects of proteins that have not yet been elucidated.

Full Text


Amylase is a hydrolysis enzyme of glycoside hydrolase family that catalyzes the hydrolysis of starch into maltose and glucose (1). As an exocrine enzyme, it is mainly produced in the pancreas and parotid glands. Hence, two isoenzymes of this enzyme have been recognized in human, which is known as alpha-amylase and beta-amylase. Alpha-amylase is produced in salivary glands, but beta-amylase is produced and secreted from pancreas (2). Beta-amylase and bacterial amylases are mainly involved in hydrolysis of polysaccharide chains such as starch and glycogen from their reducing end and produce maltose and glucose. But, alpha-amylase can nonspecifically break down polysaccharide chains with no regular pattern (3, 4).

 

Enzymes that are derived from microbial sources can be used in industrial applications such as food and detergents. Amylase is an important enzyme that is widely used in pharmaceutical industries as well as in analytical chemistry, detergents, and paper industries (5, 6). Alpha-amylases that are used in industry have mostly fungi and bacterial origin. Bacterial and fungal species such as Bacillus and Actinomycetes that are stable in various conditions such as high temperatures and acidic environment are suitable for amylase production (7).

 

The basic structure and homology of starch-degrading enzymes have been studied (8, 9). Some homolog sequences including multiple domains and starch binding domain have been recognized in this group of enzymes. These domains are also found in 10% of microbial amylase (10, 11). Since many bacteria in addition to Eukaryotes can produce amylase, finding possible similarities in different isozymes of amylase can be interesting (12, 13). Determination of similar sequences of amylase is helpful in recombinant protein engineering of this enzyme. Studies show that although sequences are more similar in species with close phylogeny, but some consensus sequences are also found in species with relatively far phylogeny. Therefore, identification of similarities and differences in the consensus sequences can help to understand the evolutionary origins of these proteins (5).

 

The aim of this study is to identify the consensus sequences, and to recognize the evolutionary origins of amylase in bacteria and human in addition to finding specific and similar functional motifs of these enzymes.

Homology and sequences analysis with CLC software

The sequences of 100 different bacterial and human amylases were searched within the UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/blast/). The sequences were then blasted using CLC workbench software V 5.1 separately to determine the similarities or differences between human and bacterial amylase. The putative sequences of human and bacterial amylases that had been obtained by sequence blasting were then analyzed.

 

Structural analysis of amylase

Structural analysis of amylase was performed using sequence homology as well as CLC workbench 5.1 and VMD (v 1.8.7) software. Structural prediction of the putative sequences was performed and confirmed using SWISS-MODEL server, CLC workbench and VMD (14, 15). Statistical data were also collected by comparing the sequences.

Sequence analysis

Bacterial and human amylase consensus sequences were obtained using blast programs. Hence, putative sequences of both species were designed based on consensus sequences. Sequence analyses of 100 thermophile bacterial amylase showed that majority of amylases contain 354 amino acid residues in their structure that is partly conserved in some species. Isoelectric point and molecular weight of the consensus sequence was estimated 5.5 and 41.016 KDa, respectively. The putative sequence of bacterial amylase that had been obtained using blast programs contained 40% hydrophobic, and 20% hydrophilic amino acid residues. Leucine and glycine were the most frequent amino acids in bacterial amylase. Lue-Asp, Lys-Glu and Gly-Asp were also shown to be the most frequent repeated dipeptide sequence (Table 1).

 

Consensus sequence of human amylase contained 511 amino acid residues with estimated isoelectric point and molecular weight of 6.73 and 57.76 KDa, respectively. Forty eight percent of all amino acid residues were hydrophobic and 27% were hydrophilic. Similar to bacterial amylase, glycine was the most frequent amino acid of human amylase.

 

C-terminal region of bacterial consensus sequence was rich of lysine (positive charge) and N-terminal region contained aromatic amino acids as well as aspartic acid (negative charge). The C-terminal of human and bacterial amylase had amino acid with positive and negative and dominant second structure is in N-terminal region with aromatic amino acid and amino acid with positive charge. Asn-Asp and Thr-Gly dipeptides were the most frequent sequences with sixteen repeats (Table 1). GFRI and VINH tetrapeptide was observed in both human and bacterial amylase sequences. But the GFRD tetrapeptide was the most frequent repeated sequence in both bacterial and human amylase. His-Asp dipeptide was observed in all bacterial amylases, so it was deduced that this dipeptide may have major role in structure or function of these proteins.

 

Table 1. Motifs found in human and bacterial amylase sequences.

 

NameMotifPeptide
 

IVHLFEW400

 

Heptapeptide
I412(x6)YL(X3)G(X3)V(X3)P

 

 

 

 

 

 

Y457(X4)Y(X1)L(X4)G(X3)E
V492(X6)G499(X)I(X)I(X2)D507(X)

Human and Bacterial amylase

V509 I 510 N511 H512

Tetrapeptide
G671F672R673I674Tetrapeptide
D713  A714 
E(D)806
L846
N853H854D855Tripeptide
L919 

SLH and SBD domain

Surface layer homology (SLH) domain is composed of one to three repeats of 50 amino acids, wherein 10 to 15 amino acids are highly conserved. Sequence analysis of this domain showed that Lue-Ala dipeptide was the most frequent dipeptide sequence in SLH domain of bacterial amylase, especially in Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes, Bacillus stearothermophilus TS-23, and Bacillus sp. XAL601. Comparison of bacterial and human SLH domain showed that there is 30% homology between the sequences of both species. The results also showed that Asp-Ile, Thr-Arg and Ala-Glu dipeptides were the most frequent dipeptides in SLH domain of two sequences (Table 2).

 

Table 2. Comparison of SLH domain in three bacterial species (Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes, Bacillus stearothermophilus TS-23, and Bacillus sp. XAL601) with putative human and bacterial amylase sequences.

 

Similar sequencesSLH domains

Asp 162-Ile 163

Lys 187-(X2)-Ile

Ala 213-(x)-lys 215

Phe 244-(x3)-Asp 248-val 249

Lys 276-(x)-Gly 278-(X)-Ile 280-(x5)-Gly 286

Thr 351-Arg 352

Phe 451-(x9)-Pro 460-(x)-Gly 462

Ala 507-Glu 508 (C-terminal)

 

 

 

Putative human amylase

Asp 3-(x4)-Trp8-(x)-Lys (N-terminal)

Lue 27-Ala 28-(x6)-Glys 35 (N-terminal)

Phe 73-(X3)-Asp 77-(x)-Lys 79

Glu 124-Trp 125

Gly 233-(x3)-Gly 237

Gly 327-Lue 328 (C-terminal)

 

 

Putative bacteria amylase

 

The sequence of starch binding domain (SBD) is almost similar among microbial amylolytic enzymes. There is also 28% similarity between human genethonin and cyclodextrin glycosiltransferase (CGTase) of Bacillus species with bacterial and human SBD (Table 3). V104XVDR, L277G, and W284, repeats were also found within the studied sequences. In addition, Phe 350, Gly 366 and Thr 357 were highly conserved in these sequences. These results may explain similar mechanism of action, despite wide difference between the origins of amylase.

 

Table 3. SBD motif in human genethonin, and bacteria CGTase compared with conserved sequence in bacterial and human amylase.

 

Ser (Thr)21-Gln

Glu 364-Asn 365

Val 381-Thr 382

Ile 505-His 506

Genethonin and human amylase

Val 104-(x)-Val-Arg

Lue 277- Gly

Ile 311-(x4)-Asn-Gln

Trp331-(x6)-Ala

Genethonin and bacteria CGTase compared with human amylase

Ile 46-Gly 47

Pro 197-Ala 198

Ile 266-(x3)-Gly 270

Bacterial CGTase and human genethonin compared with bacteria amylase

 

Structural studies

As expected by primary structure of the putative sequences, modeling and structural studies of the human and bacterial amylase showed that various types of this enzyme have similar structure. Secondary structure of the bacterial and human putative sequences are demonstrated in figure 1 and 2.

 

 

Figure 1. Secondary structure of putative bacterial amylase

 

 

Figure 2. Secondary structure of putative human amylase.

Structure and function of starch hydrolyzing enzymes including alpha and beta amylase, cyclodextrin glycosiltransferase and oligo 1, 6 glucosidase have been extensively studied (16-18). Amylase family has 5 conserved regions (substrate banding domains) with α/β barrel structure, wherein the active site of these enzymes is in C-terminal of barrel (19). Findings have shown that α/β barrel catalytic domain is composed of 8 β-strands that are surrounded by 8 α-helix structures. Because this structure was primarily observed in muscle triose phosphate isomerase (TIM), the enzymes with this folding structure are called TIM barrel enzymes (20). Sequence analysis showed that alpha amylase has 10 repeats of α/β barrels, but beta amylase has the lowest structural similarities to alpha amylase subfamily (13, 21).

 

Investigation on sequence homology of the putative-raw starch binding domain of starch-hydrolyzing enzymes that included starch-degrading enzymes from fungi showed that their structure was rich of glycine. They also showed that tryptophan, isoleucine, lysine, asparagine and threonine had an important role in binding glycoside to enzyme active site. Also, it was shown that amino acids including proline and glycine play critical role in conformation of the polypeptide (8, 22). In agreement with these findings, we showed that glycine and proline were highly conserved in the bacterial amylase, and these amino acids may have important role in poly peptide conformation. In consistent to our findings, the results of studies on SBD of amylase in bacteria, fungi and human showed that this domain exists in almost 10% of amylolytic enzymes. SBD motif was also found in genethonin, cyclodextrin glycosiltransferase and aspergillus glucoamylase. SBD in these sequences contains β-sheet and β-barrel that are mainly responsible for binding to the starch (10, 23, 24).

Since, amylase is an important enzyme with wide industrial applications, study of its structure and functional domains can help to design recombinant enzymes with broad spectrum of catalytic activities (25). In this study, we studied on different isoenzyme of bacterial and human amylase, and the results showed that these proteins with same catalytic activity have similar structure and sequence with similar functional domains. The results of this study suggest that consensus sequence of human and bacterial amylase had a highly conserved sequences including a SLH domain in outer surface of the protein that facilitate the binding of enzyme to cell wall and a SBD domain that is responsible for binding of enzyme to starch. The results of this study may provide new insights into biological aspects of amylase that can help to design new recombinant enzymes with high catalytic activity and with high resistance to pH and temperature variations.

no acknowledgement

Article Info

  • Views: 181
  • Downloads: 6
  • Citations: 0

Formats to Cite

  • How to Cite?

Open Access Policy

Copyright © 2018 iMaQPress. Open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). For more details, see our Privacy Rules

See Top Similar Articles